Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- July 2021
- January 2021
- February 2020
- September 2019
- March 2018
- February 2018
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
Categories
Monthly Archives: March 2018
说说回忆
Seeing female pig climb the tree home! Personals Condition 1.female 2.coarse legs 3.breast-feeding 4.eat less
Posted in 默写
Leave a comment
论伤南师
南师荼毗,晚辈自当勤勉怀念,然无自知者徒以扮相,文不实伤南师。小虽不敏,亦受教于夫子曰:“蜀犬虽吠,其伤日月何”。夫子南子举世家,习礼制,知贪婪纵欲易,克己复礼难,然帅之以复礼渡人,其不亦于晨门曰:“是知不可为而为之者欤?”。 夫夫子类阳货有困于匡,夫子何罪邪? 徒以子南子类国师伤之,知其不畏天命也。然子南子亦不困名衔,无自居,但寡过而已,未闻子南子学衔重重之论。无常师,师道,无及长幼。夫文安能皆实,法言功高,修《切韵》 ,经乱五代,无整本传世,至今无全本。广韵虽在,安能尽得切韵之妙?再者王阁序亦有 “豫章”“南昌”本,子安若知,情何以堪。子南子少习于塾,安知诸夫子之学其或有乍乎?或尝论葛侯,怪之文采不鲜,其实不然。咎繇著《尚书》 ,其文鲜而难通,周公著《周官》其文繁而难循,至于亮集,凡夫俗子皆能观而诵之。何也?咎繇圣人,所谈论者帝尧,虞舜,故其文鲜而难通。姬旦所论者群臣,其为万世立宗法,定礼制,故其文不得不繁,所虑者远故也。亮所论者群下也,故其文不敢不易,或以为后表非亮所出,乃他人伪作,盖伤亮文不宜鲜也。夫子南子所论者,既无圣人,鲜有群臣,盖群下者众矣,子南子何能以鲜文渡人?此百年流弊故也,是为论。
Posted in memory
Leave a comment
能才论
很早之前中毒太深时写的 尝习文,试言能才.才者,所以载于文而识于心者也.能者,用才之术也. 凡人者,盖习才于书社,而未能化才为能者多矣.习才者,习<大学>为先。夫大学之道,学为大, 修身为本,竟以至善.亮曰:’夫才须学也,学须静也,无学无以成才,无才无以为能’, 亦习才之道也.夫善化才为能者,鲜矣.昔或誉夫子曰:’夫子其圣人乎?何其多能也?’, 赐以为然,以告夫子.曰:’少且贱,固能多鄙事’,盖多能者亦多鄙事也? 才得者修身为重.夫一坛哥喻能为滚汤,修身为壶.盖人之壶高于汤也,反之, 则汤出而伤人,修身为能者不可以不慎.小窝沪期年,见汤出于壶者不可胜数,为人臣者 不可以不慎,为人子者不可以不慎.夫修身求能者须立远志,夫子十五有志于学而四十有成. 中人当有所虑也.夫修之大者何如?夫子问蘧瑗使,答之以思寡过,师德训弟以唾面,过获冢而戒其军樵采者死也. 小也立志修身,久未得其道,近有所得,为文以志之.
Posted in memory
Leave a comment